Legal Opinion
Tonini v. Board of County Com'rs
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 16, 1924No. 13562PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs in error against the defendants in error and they will be designated in this opinion as they appeared in the lower court.
The petition alleges that plaintiffs are architects, that Wayman Thompson, R. A. Smith, and William Tell comprise the board of county commissioners, the said William Tell having succeeded A. E. Young who is also named as a defendant. That defendants, acting as a board of county commissioners, entered into a contract with the plaintiffs whereby plaintiffs were to prepare plans and specifications for the construction…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Peterson v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Town of Grove v. Haskell, GovernorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Vermeule v. City of CorningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- City of Houston v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Tootle v. KentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Board of Com'rs v. A. C. Davis & SonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Reed v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Tonini & Bramblet v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931