Legal Opinion

Tonini & Bramblet v. Board of Com'rs

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 28, 1931No. 18843PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCullison, J.

Plaintiffs, for their cause of action, state that plaintiffs are experienced architects and a copartnership; that on December 7, 1920, they entered into a written contract with the board of county commissioners of Mayes county, whereby plaintiffs would prepare complete plans and specifications for a courthouse to be built in said county; that plaintiffs would be present when said contract was awarded; plaintiffs were to have for their services as architects an amount equal to 5 per cent, of the cost of the proposed building.

Plaintiffs, further pleading, say: That on or about May 2, 1921, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sinking-Fund CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Smith v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Town of Red Fork v. Gantt-Baker Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Foster v. Board of Com'rs of Custer CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Tonini v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carmichael v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API