Tonini & Bramblet v. Board of Com'rs
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtCullison, J.
Plaintiffs, for their cause of action, state that plaintiffs are experienced architects and a copartnership; that on December 7, 1920, they entered into a written contract with the board of county commissioners of Mayes county, whereby plaintiffs would prepare complete plans and specifications for a courthouse to be built in said county; that plaintiffs would be present when said contract was awarded; plaintiffs were to have for their services as architects an amount equal to 5 per cent, of the cost of the proposed building.
Plaintiffs, further pleading, say: That on or about May 2, 1921, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sinking-Fund CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Smith v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Town of Red Fork v. Gantt-Baker Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Foster v. Board of Com'rs of Custer CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Tonini v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carmichael v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970