Legal Opinion

Eigenmann v. Clark

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 4, 1898No. 2,616PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Perry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

Appellants brought this action on three promissory notes, executed by Abram D. Clark and Emma Clark, his wife, May 4, 1894, for $500 each, payable to Samuel L. Sulzer in thirty, sixty, and ninety days, respectively, and assigned by Samuel L. Sulzer to appellants November 30, 1894. To the complaint of appellants, which is in ordinary form, the defendants filed separate answers, — Abram D. Clark, in four paragraphs; his codefendant, Emma Clark, in two paragraphs. The first paragraph of the separate answer of Abram D. Clark is the general denial; the second, third, and fourth are in the nature…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. Jackson & McJimpseyNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Tuscumbia, Courtland & Decatur Rail Road v. RhodesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  3. Chance v. Isaacs & SmythNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  4. Blount v. RickIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Sefton v. HargettIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Porter v. RosemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Hammond Pure Ice & Coal Co. v. HeitmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Nolan Bros. Lumber v. Dudley Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Wolcott, Receiver v. PierreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Anderson v. BiggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API