Legal Opinion

Hood v. Bond

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1938No. 4347PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Justice.

Plaintiff (appellant) sued to quiet title. Defendant resisted, asserting title in himself, praying for a decree quieting his title. Plaintiff answered defendant’s cross-complaint with denials and pleaded affirmatively certain facts. Defendant demurred to the answer on the ground that the facts pleaded are insufficient in law and do not constitute a defense to the answer and claim of title of defendant. The court sustained the demurrer. Plaintiff refused, to plead further and his cause was dismissed. In consequence the record discloses the following admitted facts from which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Witt v. EvansNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Ex parte ChamberlainU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1893
  4. Metcalfe v. Commonwealth Land & Lumber Company's ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  5. Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1886

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sims v. VosburgNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Kershner v. SganziniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Perschbacher v. MoseleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. ThomsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Turner v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API