Legal Opinion

Estate of Johnson v. Randall Smith, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2013No. 2012-0014PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, we confront the proper application of R.C. 2317.43, Ohio’s statute that prevents the admission of certain statements made by healthcare providers. Also known as the apology statute, R.C. 2317.43 provides opportunities for healthcare providers to apologize and console victims of unanticipated outcomes of medical care without fear that their statements will be used against them in a malpractice suit, by making the statements inadmissible as evidence of an admission of liability or a statement against interest. We are asked to determine whether R.C. 2317.43 can be applied to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HancockOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Sears v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Illinois Controls, Inc. v. LanghamOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kilbreath v. RudyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Zimmie v. ZimmieOhio Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Esber Beverage Co. v. Labatt USA Operating Co., L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Taylor v. First Resolution Invest. Corp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Brown v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Stewart v. Vivian (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  5. In re K.W., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Highland County2018

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API