Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Talikka

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2013No. 2012-1324PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Leo Johnny Talikka of Painesville, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0006613, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1968. In a third amended complaint filed on July 18, 2012, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Talikka with professional misconduct in his handling of eight separate client matters.

{¶ 2} The parties entered into stipulations of fact and misconduct with respect to all eight counts, acknowledging that Talikka had committed multiple violations of 12 Rules of Professional Conduct — 38 violations in all. They stipulated to 62 *324exhibits, four aggravating…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. AgopianOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. ClaflinOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. FolwellOhio Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Corner (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Akron Bar Association v. BednarskiOhio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Cheselka (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. Dougherty and Cicero (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. Moody.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API