Legal Opinion

Elden v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 19, 1980No. 411-77PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before the court on exceptions by the parties to the recommended decision of Senior Trial Judge Mastin G. White, filed May 21, 1979, *241pursuant to Rule 134(h), having been submitted and considered on the briefs and oral argument of counsel.

Defendant’s sole exception to the trial judge’s report is denied. As explained in defendant’s brief, it is concerned that the court at trial refused a "directed verdict” and insisted on receiving evidence that the flooding of plaintiffs leasehold was "necessary.” Evidence was readily provided and the ultimate decision was in defendant’s favor.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Bragg v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Thanet Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  4. Timber Access Industries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. George Hyman Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Roy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  3. Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. ACE Constructors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Nicholson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API