Legal Opinion

Mainor v. Hobbie

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 30, 1969No. K-215PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLS, Acting Chief Judge.

In this class suit brought by Mainor and others, all of which own property in Bagdad Subdivision, the plaintiffs have appealed from an adverse summary judgment finding that they had no standing to enjoin the Hobbies from fencing in a portion of Simpson Street and an irregular strip of land bordering Blackwater Bay.

Two questions are posed: 1. Are appellants proper parties to prosecute an action to enforce either a public or private right to use the street? 2. Did the 1951 quiet title action operate to vest title in defendants’ predecessors ?

The amended complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Miami v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. City of Palmetto v. KatschSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  3. Brown v. Florida Chautauqua Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  4. Robbins v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  5. Thomas v. WadeSupreme Court of Florida · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brevard County v. BlaskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Supal v. PelotDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Hurt v. LenchukDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1978
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API