Legal Opinion

Hughes v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 21, 2002No. CR 01-699PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D ONALD L. CORBIN, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether the Double Jeopardy Clause bars conviction of a lesser-included offense following a directed verdict on the greater offense, during the same proceeding. The Arkansas Court of Appeals concluded that such a conviction was barred, and it reversed Appellant Robert Hughes’s conviction of attempted manufacture of methamphetamine. See Hughes v. State, 74 Ark. App. 126, 46 S.W.3d 538 (2001). The State filed a petition for review of the court of appeals’s decision, and we granted it, pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. l-2(e). When we grant review…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Blueford v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Standridge v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Cummings v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Ilo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Hamm v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API