Hughes v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
D ONALD L. CORBIN, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether the Double Jeopardy Clause bars conviction of a lesser-included offense following a directed verdict on the greater offense, during the same proceeding. The Arkansas Court of Appeals concluded that such a conviction was barred, and it reversed Appellant Robert Hughes’s conviction of attempted manufacture of methamphetamine. See Hughes v. State, 74 Ark. App. 126, 46 S.W.3d 538 (2001). The State filed a petition for review of the court of appeals’s decision, and we granted it, pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. l-2(e). When we grant review…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Blueford v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Standridge v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Cummings v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Ilo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Hamm v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.