Rolen v. Burroughs Wellcome Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CUMMINGS, Justice.
Robert Rolen appeals the granting of a summary judgment in favor of Burroughs Wellcome Company. On appeal, Rolen raises nine points of error regarding the sufficiency of Burroughs Wellcome’s affidavits and the adequacy of the summary judgment evidence.
On April 16, 1988, Rolen, who was 80 years of age, was examined by his physician, William Kinzie, and received a prescription for allopurinol. Burroughs Well-come markets allopurinol under the brand name Zyloprim. Rolen took the medication as directed by Dr. Kinzie. On May 4, 1988, Rolen returned to Dr. Kinzie’s office…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Anderson v. SniderTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Bristol-Myers Co. v. GonzalesTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Technical Chemical Company v. JacobsTexas Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Ackermann v. Wyeth PharmaceuticalsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- McNeil v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Centocor, Inc. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Ebel v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Bean v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.