Legal Opinion
United States v. Garry M. Chadwick
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 19, 1969No. 144-68_1PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Chief Judge.
Appellant Garry M. Chadwick was convicted at jury trial for violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2311. On appeal, he first contends that a federal officer failed to arraign him before the nearest available United States Commissioner “without unnecessary delay”, as required by Rule 5(a),1 Fed.R.Crim.P., and that incriminating statements made to the federal officer during the alleged delay were consequently inadmissible.
Following the explicit teachings of McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 63 S.Ct. 608, 87 L.Ed. 819 (1943); Upshaw v. United States, 335 U.S. 410, 69…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Thomas AllenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. William Darrell Halbert, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Joseph WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Alphonse JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Charles Frederick Woods, and United States of America v. Gerald Keith UnderwoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.