Legal Opinion

Connor v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 29, 1973No. 5790PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Appellant was charged with sodomy by an act of fellatio (oral stimulation of penis) under Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-815 (Repl. 1964). He appeals from his conviction on the grounds that no statute makes fellatio a public offense; that § 41-815 is so vague and broad as to deprive appellant of his federal constitutional rights; and the section establishes a religion and invades the right of privacy.

The cited statute reads: “Every person convicted of sodomy, or buggery shall be imprisoned in the penitentiary for a period of not less than one (1) nor more than twenty-one (21) years.”

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Turbeville v. GowdyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Havens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Strum v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Mangrum v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Neville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. John Martin Connor v. Terrell D. HuttoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  4. Verser v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  5. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Santos MolinaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API