Legal Opinion

Mangrum v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 18, 1957No. 4856PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

Appellant, Clyde Mangrum, was convicted of the crime of sodomy (% 41-813 Ark. Stats.); and prosecutes this appeal. The motion for new trial contains twenty-tbree assignments wbicb we group and discuss in topic headings.

I. Sufficiency Of The Evidence. The act of sodomy charged by the information in this case was, £ £ unnatural sexual relations with Edward Brasshire, another male, being aged 9 years old, by forceably placing his sex organ in the mouth of said child. ’ ’ Such information charged an offense denounced by § 41-813 Ark. Stats. See Woolford v.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hummel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  2. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Criglow v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Mell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  5. Crosby v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  2. Kitchen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  5. Connor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API