Mangrum v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.
Appellant, Clyde Mangrum, was convicted of the crime of sodomy (% 41-813 Ark. Stats.); and prosecutes this appeal. The motion for new trial contains twenty-tbree assignments wbicb we group and discuss in topic headings.
I. Sufficiency Of The Evidence. The act of sodomy charged by the information in this case was, £ £ unnatural sexual relations with Edward Brasshire, another male, being aged 9 years old, by forceably placing his sex organ in the mouth of said child. ’ ’ Such information charged an offense denounced by § 41-813 Ark. Stats. See Woolford v.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hummel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Criglow v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Mell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Crosby v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Kitchen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
- Connor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.