Legal Opinion

State v. Anthony Bonam

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 13, 1999No. 02C01-9804-CR-00109PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN H. PEAY, Judge.

The defendant was convicted of burglary of a motor vehicle and sentenced as a Range III persistent offender to serve five years in the Department of Correction. He now appeals, arguing that he was denied due process of law and a trial by jury because the trial court instructed the jury with what he appears to claim is a mandatory presumption on the issue of intent. Finding no merit to the defendant’s argument, we affirm his conviction and sentence.

The trial evidence established that an off-duty police officer moonlighting as a security guard at a Memphis bus station…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. State v. BolinTennessee Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Dennis Morgan - DissentingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  2. State of Tennessee v. Dylan BrewerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2019
  3. State of Tennessee v. Mickey Lee WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  4. Theodore Edward Whittley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API