State v. Anthony Bonam
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN H. PEAY, Judge.
The defendant was convicted of burglary of a motor vehicle and sentenced as a Range III persistent offender to serve five years in the Department of Correction. He now appeals, arguing that he was denied due process of law and a trial by jury because the trial court instructed the jury with what he appears to claim is a mandatory presumption on the issue of intent. Finding no merit to the defendant’s argument, we affirm his conviction and sentence.
The trial evidence established that an off-duty police officer moonlighting as a security guard at a Memphis bus station…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. BolinTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Dennis Morgan - DissentingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- State of Tennessee v. Dylan BrewerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2019
- State of Tennessee v. Mickey Lee WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
- Theodore Edward Whittley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010