Legal Opinion
Lee-Moore Oil Company v. Union Oil Company of California, Lee-Moore Oil Company v. Union Oil Company of California
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 21, 1979No. 78-1208, 78-1209PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge:
After defendant Union Oil Company of California (Union) terminated its supply contract with plaintiff Lee-Moore Oil Company (Lee-Moore), Lee-Moore brought this private antitrust action under § 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15.1 The district court granted Union’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that Lee-Moore’s evidence failed to show that it had suffered any damages compensable under the antitrust laws. We disagree. We think that Lee-Moore’s evidence shows injury which, if proved to have been caused by an antitrust violation, would be recoverable under § 4.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Engine Specialties, Inc. v. Bombardier LimitedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Cellular Plus, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Malcolm v. Marathon Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Kolling v. Dow Jones & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Frank J. Ostrofe v. H. S. Crocker Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.