Legal Opinion
Tigerswan, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 18, 2014No. 1:12-cv-00062PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion for Summary Judgment; Termination for Convenience; Abdication of Contracting Officer’s Authority; Disputed Issues of Material Fact
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) filed by defendant the United States (“the government”) and plaintiff TigerSwan, Inc. (“TSI”). In this case, TSI alleges that the United States Department of Defense (“DOD”) wrongfully terminated for convenience its contract to provide security services to support the Task Force for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- James v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Stathis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Baley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Securiforce International America, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.