Legal Opinion

Finley v. Stripling

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1929No. 1784PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Quinn, J.

We shall refer to plaintiff in error as plaintiff and to defendant in error as defendant, that being their status in the trial court.

Plaintiff sued defendant in the district court of Nacogdoches county to recover in the sum of $4,000. In view of the natúre of the suit and the action of the court in passing Upon the sufficiency of plaintiff’s petition, the petition will be set out in full.

Plaintiff’s petition, omitting formal parts, reads:

“2. That on and prior to the 1st day of June A. D. 1924, E. B. Norman & Co. were engaged in the cotton and grain brokerage business, and as such maintained…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Floyd v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Seeligson v. Lewis & WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hall v. EdwardsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  4. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. Logan v. NorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spangler v. SpanglerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Fenley v. Bewley Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Friddell v. MassengillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API