Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1934No. 24690PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is the contention of relatrix, the widow of the decedent, that though living apart and in different countries prior to and at the time of her husband's death, she was entitled to a conclusive presumption of total dependency, which is not rebuttable. Section 1465-82, General Code, reads in part as follows:

"5. The following persons shall be presumed to be wholly dependent for support upon a decedent employe:
"(A) A wife upon a husband with whom she lives at the time of his death.
"(B) A child or children under the age of sixteen years * * *.
"In all other cases, the question of dependency, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Northwestern Iron Co. v. Indusrrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Fierro's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Mooradjian's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Kalcic v. Newport Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Klautka v. Stanley WorksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Becker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. Olsen v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. State ex rel. Pivk v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API