Legal Opinion

Kalcic v. Newport Mining Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1917No. Docket No. 70PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Antonija Kalcic presented her claim for compensation for the accidental, death of her husband in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant brings certiorari. Appellant respondent in this proceeding reviews by certiorari an order of the industrial accident board by the terms of which claimant was awarded the sum of $8.70 per week for a period of 300 weeks.

Read the full summary

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Antonija Kalcic presented her claim for compensation for the accidental, death of her husband in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant brings certiorari. Appellant respondent in this proceeding reviews by certiorari an order of the industrial accident board by the terms of which claimant was awarded the sum of $8.70 per week for a period of 300 weeks. Said order modified the award of the arbitration board which had allowed the claimant only the sum of $1 per week during a period of 300 weeks. The facts which formed the…

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

(a-fter stating the facts). The order of the board indicates that it was based upon the theory that claimant was wholly dependent upon her deceased husband at the time of the accident. It does *369not indicate whether the conclusion was reached upon the ground that the wife was living with the husband at the time of the accident, within the meaning of the statute, and therefore conclusively presumed to be totally dependent, or that the total dependency appeared from the proofs in the case. It is the claim of the respondent that in either case there was no support for the conclusion of total…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Northwestern Iron Co. v. Indusrrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Nelson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Finn v. Detroit, Mt. Clemens & Marine City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Ludwig v. American Car & Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Weems v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Paperno v. Michigan Railway Engineering Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bjorkstrand v. KlagstadMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Runnion v. SpeidelMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API