Legal Opinion

Elections Review Committee of the Eighth Utilities District v. Freedom of Information Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 30, 1991No. 14264PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The dispositive issue in this administrative appeal is whether the plaintiff, the elections review committee of the eighth utilities district (ERC), an ad hoc committee composed of one district director and three volunteer electors, is a public agency within the meaning of General Statutes § l-18a (a).1 Section l-18a (a) was amended by No. 83-3722 of the 1983 Pub-*687lie Acts to include in the definition of a “public agency” any “committee” of a public agency. We conclude that the legislature, in amending § l-18a (a), intended the term “committee” to encompass only a committee that is a subunit…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. State v. MagnanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Anderson v. LudginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  4. Board of Trustees of Woodstock Academy v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. In re Jessica M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Rose v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Gay & Lesbian Law Students Ass'n v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. State v. CainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API