Legal Opinion

Davis v. Hurt

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 7, 1927No. 11,482PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

The parties’ names appear here in inverse order from that in the trial court. When not otherwise designated, defendant in error, Nellie Hurt, will be referred to as plaintiff, and plaintiffs in error as defendants, or as Davis and Mrs. Davis.

• Plaintiff obtained an injunction against defendants involving certain water, ditch and reservoir rights, and defendants have brought the case here for review.

All of the water involved comes from Sanderson’s Gulch, in water district No. 8. The ditches concerned are Ward Ditch No. 1 and Ward Ditch No. 2. The latter was originally called Sanderson’s Ditch,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rollins v. FearnleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  2. Rollins v. Fearnley Investment & Real Estate Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Rollins v. Fearnley Investment & Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Luxen v. Town of RifleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  2. Davis v. HurtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API