Legal Opinion

Luxen v. Town of Rifle

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 24, 1937No. 13,961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bakke

Plaintiff in error brought suit in the trial court to enjoin the town of Rifle, a municipal corporation in Garfield county, from using more than its alleged allotment of water from Beaver Creek in said county. Demurrers were, filed by the defendants, which were overruled, and a témpora^ restraining order was entered, after which the defendants answered, setting up the defenses of statute of limitations, estoppel, and res judicata. The replication sought to void these defenses by setting up the plea of acquisition by adverse use. The defendants then demurred to the replication on grounds of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hague v. Nephi Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Rollins v. FearnleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  3. Davis v. HurtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. New Mercer Ditch Co. v. New Cache la Poudre Irrigating Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  5. Wilson v. BirtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Red Canyon Sheep Co. v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Town of Genoa v. WestfallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. Union Tank Car Company v. Wheat BrothersUtah Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API