Legal Opinion

Rollins v. Fearnley Investment & Real Estate Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1915No. 8246PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the Court of Appeals.

1Per curiam

In Rollins v. Fearnley Investment and Real Estate Company et al., 25 Colo. App. 85, 136 Pac. 95, the judgment of the District Court of Arapahoe County was affirmed, and plaintiff in error prosecutes a writ of error in this court to the judgment of the court of appeals.

We are satisfied, after a full and critical examination of the entire record in the case, that the findings of fact and conclusions of law reached by the District Court were correct. The Court of Appeals, upon the record, reached a like conclusion, which seems to us also to be fully warranted on the facts and law. Being…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rollins v. Fearnley Investment & Real Estate Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. HurtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API