Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1904PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Exceptions prom Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, J.

The plaintiff averred in his declaration that while a passenger on the defendant’s electric street railway car on February 22, 1902, a collision, owing to the defendant’s negligence, occurred at the crossing of Nuuanu and Hotel streets in Honolulu, between the said car and a car and team of the Hawaiian Tramways Company, by reason of which collision the plaintiff, without fault or negligence on his part, was caught and crushed between the defendant’s car and the tramway’s car and team and received serious and dangerous injuries and was greatly bruised, hurt…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Bumbear v. United Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Coddington v. . the B'klyn Crosstown R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Watson v. Portland & Cape Elizabeth Railway Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
  5. Germantown Passenger Railway Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ArenaHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Bright v. QuinnHawaii Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Grace v. KumalaaHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Ferrage v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Territory of Hawaii v. ChongHawaii Supreme Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API