Legal Opinion

Harness v. Harness

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1912No. 8,284PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Prom Clinton Circuit Coimt; Henry H. Vinton, Special Judge. Action by Arch C. Harness against George S. Harness and others. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Felt, C. J. —

Appellee, Arch C. Harness, filed suit against appellants for partition of real estate, and alleged that he is the owner of the undivided one-fourth part of 159 acres of real estate, as tenant in common with appellants. Issue was formed by general denial.

The court found for appellee, commissioners were appointed, and thirty-nine acres were set off to him in severalty. Judgment of partition, from which appellants appeal, and assign as the only error the overruling of their motion for a new trial.

Appellants asked a new trial for the following reasons: (1) The judgment of the court…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Estate of WinchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Thornburg v. American Strawboard Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Gates v. SeibertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. McDonald v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis R'y Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. In re Estate of WardellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A----. B v. C----. DIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Wilson v. BassIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Cooley v. PowersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. McKinney v. MinklerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Cahall v. HINES, ADMR.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API