Legal Opinion

Whedbee v. . Ruffin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

There are thirty-eight exceptions in the record, and a separate discussion of each is not essential to the determination of the appeal. A group of exceptions involve the question of the meaning or significance of a new trial. The concluding paragraph in the opinion in the former appeal, as will appear in 189 N. C., 262, is as follows: “There must be a new trial in order that the damages which plaintiff is entitled to recover may be ascertained, in accordance with the rule as to measure of damages herein approved. New trial.”

The plaintiff insists that the meaning of the language employed by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Table Rock Lumber Co. v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Dale v. . PresnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Brown v. . RuffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Huffman v. IngoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re McCarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Jackson v. . ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Griffis v. LazarovichCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Brown v. . LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Griffis v. LazarovichCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API