State v. . Wainscott
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Cline, J., at November Term, 1914, of EuNCombe. Defendant was indicted and convicted for selling intoxicating liquors to one B. H. Graham. From the judgment and sentence of the court the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
PeR Oukiam.
The defendant moved to quash the warrant, for the reason that it does not allege that the defendant is “other than druggist and medical depositories, duly licensed thereto.” The motion was properly overruled, as the identical question has been decided adversely to the defendant’s contention in S. v. Moore, 166 N. C., 284.
There are four exceptions relating to the admission and rejection of testimony, which we have examined, and find them to be without merit. The sixth and ninth exceptions relate to the charge. The defendant requested the court to instruct the jury that the testimony…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. . EppsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. EppsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. . HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.