Legal Opinion
Becker v. Barbur Blvd. Equipment Rentals, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 15, 1986No. A8310-06733; CA A34303PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their complaint for damages for personal injuries and loss of consortium. Because we hold that the complaint alleges facts sufficient to state claims for negligence, strict product liability, breach of implied warranty and loss of consortium, we reverse.
The complaint alleged that plaintiff Carolyn Becker 1 rented a rooftop bicycle rack from defendant Barbur Blvd. Equipment Rentals (Rentals). The rack was manufactured by defendant Schwinn Bicycle Company (Schwinn) and was selected and installed on the roof of plaintiffs van by Rentals’ employes, including…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- McEvoy v. HeliksonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Mezyk v. National Repossessions, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Russell v. Ford Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Dewey v. A. F. Klaveness & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gattman v. FavroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Knepper v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Becker v. Barbur Blvd. Equipment Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Moore v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Sloan ex rel. Sloan v. Providence Health System-OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.