Legal Opinion
United States v. Ford
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 23, 1976No. Crim. 76-55 to 76-59PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GESELL, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Motions to suppress are before the Court raising questions common to these five indictments in which eight defendants are charged with various narcotic drug offenses under the United States and District of Columbia Codes. The Government’s proof is based in part on interceptions of oral communications made by the District of Columbia police after having placed transmitting devices inside the Meljerveen Ltd. Shoe Circus, an establishment located on Georgia Avenue, N.W., in Washington, D.C. The police acted under an order of another Judge of this Court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Osborn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. ArmocidaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dalia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. ScafidiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. FordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Application of the United States for an Order Authorizing the Interception of Oral Communications, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. DaliaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.