Legal Opinion
Motor Terminals, Inc. v. National Car Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 12, 1949No. Civ. A. 1094PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff is an Ohio corporation, and both defendants are Delaware corporations. The amount in controversy is alleged in the complaint to exceed $3,000 in value. Both the plaintiff, Motor Terminals, Incorporated, and the defendant, National 'Car Company, have moved ‘for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. In addition National Car Company has moved to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, upon a variety of grounds, including want of jurisdiction in this court and improper venue.
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Consumers Finance Service, Inc. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Stephenson v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Schoen v. Mountain Producers CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Sterling Industries, Inc. v. Ball Bearing Pen Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fanchon & Marco, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Taussig v. Wellington Fund, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960
- Hanby v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- Hendricks v. Knik Supply, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Stern & Co. v. State Loan and Finance CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.