Close v. Derbyshire
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
The parties, by agreement- entered into on January 1,1944, formed a partnership under the name of Derby-shire Machine and Tool Company for the manufacture of jet pumps and other appliances on customer specifications. The business was extensive and succe.ss.ful. The firm in 1944 made a net profit of over $43,000 and plaintiff received more than $11,000 as his share of the earnings for the year. This was an established.business when plaintiff became á partner, and over a period of years the defendants as a matter of shop policy had always charged off the cost of small tools…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Voitasefski v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Scranton Lackawanna Trust Co. v. BirbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Dimes Savings Institution v. Allentown BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Close v. DerbyshireSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949