Legal Opinion
McNeal v. Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 28, 1985No. 84-1155PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner, Arthur B. McNeal, appeals from a decision by respondent, the Police and Firefighters’ Retirement and Relief Board (the Board), terminating his disability annuity on the grounds that petitioner had been restored to earning capacity within the meaning of D.C.Code § 4-620(a) (1981). Petitioner contends that the Board’s decision was arbitrary and capricious, and was not supported by substantial evidence. Specifically, petitioner argues that the Board erred in applying the provi*933sions of § 4-620(a) to him, in determining his right to benefits. Petitioner also challenges the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- District of Columbia v. MitchellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- District of Columbia Retirement Board v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- Ridge v. Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- District of Columbia v. MitchellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Zoglio v. MnuchinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018