Mingo v. Roadway Express, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant Roadway Express, Incorporated’s motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons the court grants in part and denies in part defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
I. BACKGROUND 1
Defendant Roadway Express Incorporated (“Roadway”) is a common carrier in the “less-than-truckload” transportation business. In the present action, Mingo is suing Roadway under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., claiming that Roadway violated Title VII by (1) subjecting her to a sexually-charged,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fenje v. FeldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Lyles v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Lyles v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Anaya v. BirckDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Bulk Transport Corp v. FE Rail, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.