Abrook v. Ellis
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, denying a motion for a new trial. Thomas F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal by defendants Clara Ellis and George D. Collins from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
Mary Kilroy, a resident of San Francisco, died in London September 6, 1901. At the time of her death she owned and had on deposit in certain banks in San Francisco sums of money aggregating over $15,000. The deceased was generally known by the name of Mary Kilroy, although she was sometimes called Mary Abrook. She left surviving her a husband, John Abrook, and a daughter, Clara Ellis. December 7, 1901, Clara Ellis, through her attorney George D. Collins, filed a petition for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barnes v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Peachy v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Baumberger v. ArffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Kneebone v. KneeboneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People ex rel. Jennings v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Latta v. Western Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Flynn v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Baxter v. BoegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. HumphreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919