Legal Opinion
Tenants & Owners in Opposition to Redevelopment v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 6, 1975No. C-69 324 SAWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DISMISSING THE MOTION OF PETITIONERS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
BOLDT, Senior District Judge, Sitting by Designation.
I. BACKGROUND OF THE LITIGATION:
In an effort to rehabilitate a blighted area within San Francisco, .application was made to the Federal government for loans and grants to redevelop the affected area. Defendant San Francisco Redevelopment Agency applied for the funds and played an integral role in planning the project. The Federal government provided the requested aid and defendant agency began to implement the redevelopment plan. On November 5, 1969…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lebanks v. SpearsDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1976
- Trinity Episcopal Schools Corp. v. HillsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976