Woodlief v. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Dr. Woodlief brings forward eleven questions for review from his assignments of error. The first eight questions address the issue of whether the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Board, affirmed by the trial judge, are supported by substantial evidence in view of the whole record as submitted. The other three assignments of error address the issue of whether the Board applied the correct standard of care. All twelve questions challenge the Board’s actions as being arbitrary and capricious. After careful review of the record, we disagree and affirm the trial court’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Lewis v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- High Rock Lake Ass'n v. North Carolina Environmental Management CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sibley v. North Carolina Board of Therapy ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- The NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR v. EthridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- McCollough v. North Carolina State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Homoly v. North Carolina State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Sibley v. North Carolina Board of Therapy ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.