Legal Opinion

McCollough v. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 20, 1993No. 9130SC1270PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Pursuant to his first assignment of error, petitioner contends that the Board’s suspension was improper because the Board failed to give petitioner proper notice of the nature of the charge against him. Petitioner contends that while the notice he received informed him that he faced charges of sexual misconduct, arising out of allegations that he administered nitrous oxide to a female patient while alone with her in his office, the notice did not sufficiently inform him that the Board intended to inquire into whether petitioner’s administration of nitrous oxide to a female…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Little v. North Carolina State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. In Re GuessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Woodlief v. North Carolina State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fieser v. Kansas State Board of Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. Hardee v. North Carolina Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. North Carolina Board of PharmacyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Walker v. The N.C. State Bd. Of Dental Exam'rsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API