Legal Opinion

Estate of Gage v. State

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 22, 2005No. 03-403PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

¶ 1. This appeal requires us to determine whether the discretionary function exception to the Vermont Tort Claims Act applies to immunize the State of Vermont from a negligence action arising out of an incident in which a vehicle left the roadway, flipped over a guardrail, rolled down an embankment, and landed in a brook, resulting in several drowning deaths. The State contends the decision whether to remove or guard against the drowning hazard involved policy considerations of the kind the discretionary function exception was designed to shield from suit. We agree, and therefore reverse the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Sheila Gotha v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Earle v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  2. Keith & Jackie Lorman, Charles & Melissa Gallagher, and Daniel & Alicia Daly v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  3. Tina Stocker v. State of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  4. Johnson v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  5. Paul Civetti v. Selby Turner & Town of Isle La MotteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API