Legal Opinion
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. Britt
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided July 2, 1934No. 4-3452PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.
Tbis action was begun in the Scott Circuit Court against the appellant and Dr. J. P. Runyan for injuries alleged to have been sustained by the appellee, Mrs. Sue Britt, by reason of an infection in her eye, the result of what she charged to be negligence on the part of Dr. Runyan. Dr. Runyan was chief surgeon at Little Rock for the appellant company. Mrs. Britt was employed as a registered nurse by the appellant. The following contract was introduced in evidence:
“This agreement, made in duplicate this 15th day of March, 1928, between The Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, by S.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fire Insurance Patrol v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. ArtistCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Phillips v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Arkansas Midland Railroad v. PearsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. FoardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Patricia Franza v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Baldwin v. WingfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Arkansas Motor Coaches, Ltd. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Manhattan Construction Company v. AtkissonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- The Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. SpringerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.