Legal Opinion

Manhattan Construction Company v. Atkisson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 2, 1935No. 4-4061PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

Appellee filed his complaint in the Washington Circuit Court against the appellant to recover damages for injury to his right hip, alleging that he was in the employ of the appellant, working under the orders' of appellant’s superintendents and foremen, and alleges the duty of the master to use reasonable care to furnish a safe place to work and reasonably safe machinery, and to maintain the place to work- in reasonably safe condition; that it was its duty to inspect the machinery and to discover and remedy defects. It is alleged that the appellant carelessly and negligently failed to perform…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barlow v. FosterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Cunningham v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Missouri & North Arkansas Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  4. Holcomb v. American Surety CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Healey & Roth v. BalmatSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beene v. HuttoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  2. Wade v. BrocatoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  3. Neal v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. James v. LloydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  5. Missouri Pac. Rd. Co., Guy A. Thompson v. CreekmoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API