Legal Opinion
Southern Pac. Co. v. Hanlon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 14, 1925No. 4655PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This is a writ of error to review a judgment for the plaintiff in an action to recover damages for personal injuries. The sufficiency of the testimony to warrant the submission of the case to the jury is the only question presented for consideration here. At the time of receiving the injuries complained of the defendant in error was a passenger on a train operated by the plaintiff in error between Portland, Or., and Chico, Cal. Soon after the train left Glendale, Or., it was brought to a sudden stop by an application of the emergency brakes, and the sudden stopping and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Nashville Interurban Ry. v. GregoryTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- Walters v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
- The Great NorthernCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Elzig v. GudwangenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- May Department Stores Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- F. T. Dooley Lumber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. v. WindhamDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1939
- McQuin v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.