Legal Opinion

American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. v. Windham

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided February 7, 1939No. 222PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEAVER, District Judge.

1. C. E. Havnaer, who controlled the Puritan Candy Company, and W. M. Allen, its salesman, who kept and used the company’s automobile involved in this case, testified that Allen’s personal usé of the car was expressly limited to Bibb County and that any trip out of the county was expressly prohibited, except when specific permission for any such trip was obtained in advance. I have not been able to accept that testimony, though there is no direct, positive testimony to the contrary. If the court is bound by that testimony, then the decree in this case is wrong, because…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Fielder v. DavisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Patton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Rasmussen v. GreslyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  5. O'LAUGHLIN v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Clarkson Construction Company v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  3. Bourne Ex Rel. Bourne v. ManleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. De MaisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  5. Mazdra v. Selective Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API