Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Paul C. "Paulie" Villano

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1987No. 85-2535Published

1Concurrence

McKAY, Circuit Judge,

concurring, with SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge, joining in this concurring opinion:

While I agree with the result in this case, I believe that a different analytical approach is dictated. In these days of choked calendars, we ought to give primary consideration to procedural solutions that will minimize potential points of litigation, avoiding like the plague a multiplication of rules whenever a sensible overarching rule will achieve at least equally just and manageable results. The proliferation of opinions in the cases we have considered en banc to address sentencing problems…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. Patrick Henry EarleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. William E. Gaddis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API