Holleyman v. Holleyman

OPALA, V.CJ.

{1 This matrimonial dispute comes now for our consideration of appellant's motion to tax costs. See Supreme Court Rule 1.14a1 and the provisions of 12 0.98.2001 § 9782 Appellant's motion is granted and the three cost items sought to be recovered (totaling $333.75) stand allowed.

I

THE PROVISIONS OF § 978 COMMAND THAT A PREVAILING APPELLANTS COSTS ON REVERSAL OF A JUDGMENT BE TAXED DE CUR-SU3

12 The terms of § 978, whose *941enforcement procedure is regulated by Rule 1.142, mandate that at the conclusion of appellate litigation the prevailing party be entitled to recover taxable costs de…