State v. Tenore
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
“A motion to quash is a proper method of testing the sufficiency of the warrant * * * to charge a criminal offense. It is not a means of testing the guilt or innocence of the defendant with respect to a crime properly charged.” State v. Cooke, et al., 248 N.C. 485, 489, 103 S.E. 2d 846. We do not have before us on this appeal any question concerning the sufficiency of evidence to establish the defendant’s guilt of the offense charged in the warrant, if any, for no evidence has been offered. For the purposes of this appeal, we take the facts to be as alleged in the warrant. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- High Point Surplus Company v. PleasantsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Craig v. County of ChathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Stillings v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Onslow County v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- U. T. Inc. v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1978
- State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.