Legal Opinion
Kimbrell v. Cockrell
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 24, 2002No. 01-10046PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:
This court granted COA to review whether (1) the AEDPA one-year limitation period (28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)) applies to § 2254 petitions contesting the outcome of prison disciplinary proceedings; and (2) if so, when that period began to run in this case. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Finding no error in the district court’s reasoning, we affirm.
Although we have not previously decided these precise issues, this court has clearly held that when a prisoner is eligible for mandatory supervised release, and when prison disciplinary proceedings result in a change in good-time…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Malchi v. ThalerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Wadsworth v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Kenneth Wayne Story v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Brown v. BarrowCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Destinni Mardesich v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Frank G. McAleese v. Edward T. Brennan, Superintendent Pennsylvania Board of Probation and ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Paul Alywen Redd, Jr. v. Joe McGrathCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Eric v. Shelby v. James Bartlett, Warden Brian Superintendant of Oregon State Penitentiary, SuperintendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.