Legal Opinion
Dandy Dan Taxi, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 6, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In a proceeding to confirm an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), dated May 31, 1988, which denied the application, granted the respondent’s cross application to vacate the award, and directed a new arbitration hearing.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The appellant had substantial contact with the respondent’s New York City representative, RMG Investigations, Inc. (hereinafter RMG), concerning the property damage claim arising out of an accident. Thereafter, the appellant sent a notice of arbitration…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crawford v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance v. BoisetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re the Arbitration between Nixon Taxi Corp. & State Farm General InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- Colonial Penn Insurance v. EnnabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Osbeck v. Westcon, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Hanover Insurance v. Cannon Express Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003