Legal Opinion

Hull v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 2003No. 49A02-0304-CR-359PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOK, Chief Judge.

Case Summary

Appellant-defendant Richard Hull appeals the sentence he received after pleading guilty to two counts of murder. We vacate and remand for resentencing.

Issues

Hull raises two issues, which we restate as:

I. Whether his delayed sentence violates Indiana law; and

II. Whether the trial court improperly deviated from the terms of his plea agreement.

Facts and Procedural History

On October 31, 2000, the State charged Hull with two counts of murder. Hull and the State signed a written agreement in which Hull pleaded guilty to both charges and the following sentencing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kleinrichert v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Beanblossom v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Crump v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Golden v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Erby v. IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gist v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Hull v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Bryant E. Wilson v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Bryant E. Wilson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Chism v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API