Hull v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOK, Chief Judge.
Case Summary
Appellant-defendant Richard Hull appeals the sentence he received after pleading guilty to two counts of murder. We vacate and remand for resentencing.
Issues
Hull raises two issues, which we restate as:
I. Whether his delayed sentence violates Indiana law; and
II. Whether the trial court improperly deviated from the terms of his plea agreement.
Facts and Procedural History
On October 31, 2000, the State charged Hull with two counts of murder. Hull and the State signed a written agreement in which Hull pleaded guilty to both charges and the following sentencing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kleinrichert v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Beanblossom v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Crump v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Golden v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Erby v. IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gist v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Hull v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Bryant E. Wilson v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Bryant E. Wilson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Chism v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.