Gist v. State

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Christopher Gist appeals his sentence for conspiracy to commit robbery as a Class B felony. Specifically, he argues that the trial court failed to find several mitigators and that his ten-year presumptive sentence is inappropriate. In light of the State's concession at sentencing that two mitigators are present, it is unclear whether the trial court found no aggrava-tors or mitigators or whether the trial court found aggravators and mitigators but concluded that they balanced. We therefore remand this case to the trial court for a more definite sentencing…