Legal Opinion
Stancil v. Stancil
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 13, 1990No. 299PA89PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Justice.
The plaintiff filed this action on 29 October 1986 to compel the specific performance of an alleged oral agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant. The plaintiff alleged that the agree ment gave him the right to purchase the defendant’s shares of stock in Bruce Stancil Refrigeration, Inc. The defendant raised as an affirmative defense that article 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code — Investment Securities (hereinafter, article 8), codified in Chapter 25 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, makes such oral agreements for the sale of investment securities…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Meiselman v. MeiselmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Penley v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Zamore v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Blasingame v. American Materials, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- Wamser v. BambergerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wakefield v. CrawleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Allen v. FerreraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Allen v. CoatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Allen Ex Rel. Allen & Brock v. FerreraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Giuffre Organization, Ltd. v. Euromotorsport Racing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.